loading...
The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2003.10005July/August 2003 (vol. 23 no. 4) pp. 73-77
 This Article 
 
Buy PURCHASE ARTICLE: $19
PDF
HTML
IEEE Xplore Subscribers
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
ASCII Text
x 
 
"The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel," IEEE Micro, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 73-77, July/August, 2003.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/MM.2003.10005,
author = {},
title = {The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel},
journal ={IEEE Micro},
volume = {23},
number = {4},
issn = {0272-1732},
year = {2003},
pages = {73-77},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2003.10005},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - MGZN
JO - IEEE Micro
TI - The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel
IS - 4
SN - 0272-1732
SP73
EP77
EPD - 73-77
PY - 2003
VL - 23
JA - IEEE Micro
ER -
 

The majority of papers published by computer architecture conferences use the spec benchmark suite to measure performance. However, many researchers use only a subset of the suite. What's more surprising is how few people explain their reasons for subsetting.

Moderator: John Hennessy; Panelists: Daniel Citron, David Patterson, and Guri Sohi

Citation:
"The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel," IEEE Micro, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 73-77, July/Aug. 2003, doi:10.1109/MM.2003.10005
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.