loading...
Relativized NP Search Problems and Propositional Proof Systems
Amherst, Massachusetts June 21-June 24
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/CCC.2004.131379519th Annual IEEE Conference on Comput ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Joshua Buresh-Oppenheim, University of Toronto
Tsuyoshi Morioka, University of Toronto

An NP search problem is the problem of finding a witness to a given NP predicate, and TFNP is the class of total NP search problems. TFNP contains a number of subclasses containing natural problems; for example, PLS is the class of efficient local search heuristics. These classes are characterized by the combinatorial principle that guarantees the existence of a solution; for example, PLS is the class of such problems whose totality is assured by the principle "every dag with at least one edge has a sink."

We show many strong connections between these search classes and the computational power — in particular the proof complexity — of their underlying principles. These connections, along with lower bounds in the propositional proof systems Nullstellensatz and bounded-depth LK, allow us to prove several new relative separations among PLS, and Papadimitriou?s classes PPP, PPA, PPAD, and PPADS.

Citation:
Joshua Buresh-Oppenheim, Tsuyoshi Morioka, "Relativized NP Search Problems and Propositional Proof Systems," ccc, pp.54-67, 19th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'04), 2004
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.