loading...
Understanding Video Pixel Processing Applications for Flexible Implementations
Belek-Antalya, Turkey September 01-September 06
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/DSD.2003.1231972Euromicro Symposium on Digital System ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Om Prakash Gangwal, Philips Research
Johan Janssen, Philips Semiconductors
Selliah Rathnam, Philips Semiconductors
Erwin Bellers, Philips Semiconductors
Marc Duranton, Philips Research
Media processing system-on-chips (SoCs) mainly consist of audio encoding/decoding (e.g. AC-3, MP3), video encoding/decoding (e.g. H263, MPEG-2) and video pixel processing functions (e.g. de-interlacing, noise reduction). Video pixel processing functions have very high computational demands, as they require a large amount of computations on large amount of data (note that the data are pixels of completely decoded pictures). In this paper, we focus on video pixel processing functions. Usually, these functions are implemented in dedicated hardware. However, flexibility (by means of programmability or reconfigurability) is needed to introduce the latest innovative algorithms, to allow differentiation of products, and to allow bug fixing after fabricating chips. It is impossible to fulfill the computational requirements of these functions by current programmable media processors.
To achieve efficient implementations for flexible solutions, we will study, in this paper, the application characteristics of some representative video pixel processing functions. The characteristics considered are granularity of operations, amount and kind of data accesses and degree of parallelism present in these functions. We observe that from computational granularity point of view many functions can be expressed in terms of kernels e.g. Median3 (i.e. median of three values), finite impulse response (FIR) filters, table lookups (LUT) etc. that are coarser grain than ALU, Mult, MAC, etc. Regarding the kind of data accesses, we categorize these functions as regular, regular with some data rearrangement and irregular data access patterns. Furthermore, the degree of parallelism present in these functions is expressed in terms of data level parallelism (DLP) and instruction/operation level parallelism (ILP). We show with an example that these properties can be exploited to make specialized programmable processors.
Citation:
Om Prakash Gangwal, Johan Janssen, Selliah Rathnam, Erwin Bellers, Marc Duranton, "Understanding Video Pixel Processing Applications for Flexible Implementations," dsd, pp.392, Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design (DSD'03), 2003
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.


Suggestions