loading...
An experiment on software project size and effort estimation
Roman Castles (Rome), Italy September 30-October 01
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISESE.2003.12379712003 International Symposium on Empir ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Ursula Passing, European Business School
Martin Shepperd, Bournemouth University, UK
Expert judgement is still the dominant estimation technique in practice today for software project size and effort. In this paper, we evaluate two techniques that are frequently suggested as effective support for human estimators: checklists and group discussions. A student experiment was conducted to investigate how checklists and group discussions help estimators to improve their estimates. The results suggest that both checklists and group discussions significantly contribute to improved estimation, but in distinct and complementary ways.
Citation:
Ursula Passing, Martin Shepperd, "An experiment on software project size and effort estimation," isese, pp.120, 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'03), 2003
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.