loading...
Evaluating ATE Features in Terms of Test Escape Rates and Other Cost of Test Culprits
Baltimore, MD, USA October 07-October 10
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TEST.2002.1041860International Test Conference 2002 (I ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
John Gatej, Teradyne Inc.
Lee Song, Teradyne Inc.
Carol Pyron, Motorola Inc.
Rajesh Raina, Motorola Inc.
Tom Munns, Motorola Inc.
For years, there has been a ongoing debate in the industry regarding the effectiveness and costs associated with functional versus DFT-oriented testing and ATE. To answer important questions that arise from the functional vs. DFT debate, we consider actual production data analysis to evaluate the value of functional and DFT tests. Production test data from 10,000 parts randomly sampled from over 1 million total datalogs of the Motorola MPC7410 microprocessor, a high-volume design, is used to evaluate the value of ATE features in terms of test escape rates across different tests. We also examine the value of features that cannot necessarily be quantified in terms of test escape rates. This work will help to provide some insight into how to lower the cost of test by making the right tradeoffs in terms of ATE features without compromising overall test coverage and quality.
Citation:
John Gatej, Lee Song, Carol Pyron, Rajesh Raina, Tom Munns, "Evaluating ATE Features in Terms of Test Escape Rates and Other Cost of Test Culprits," itc, pp.1040, International Test Conference 2002 (ITC'02), 2002
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.