loading...
When Can We Test Less?
Sydney, Australia September 03-September 05
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/METRIC.2003.1232459Ninth International Software Metrics ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Tim Menzies, West Virginia University
Justin Di Stefano, West Virginia University
Kareem Ammar, West Virginia University
Kenneth McGill, Goddard Space Flight Center
Pat Callis, Goddard Space Flight Center
Robert (Mike) Chapman, Galaxy Global Corporation
John Davis, DN American
When it is impractical to rigorously assess all parts of complex systems, test engineers use defect detectors to focus their limited resources. In this article, we define some properties of an ideal defect detector and assess different methods of generating one. In the case study presented here, traditional methods of generating such detectors (e.g. reusing detectors from the literature, linear regression, model trees) were found to be inferior to those found via a PACE analysis.
Citation:
Tim Menzies, Justin Di Stefano, Kareem Ammar, Kenneth McGill, Pat Callis, Robert (Mike) Chapman, John Davis, "When Can We Test Less?," metrics, pp.98, Ninth International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'03), 2003
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.