loading...
Active versus Passive Touch in Three Dimensions
Pisa, Italy March 18-March 20
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/WHC.2005.20First Joint Eurohaptics Conference an ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Mark A. Symmons, Monash University
Barry L. Richardson, Monash University
Dianne B. Wuillemin, Monash University
George H. VanDoorn, Monash University
Active subjects freely explored virtual threedimensional geometric shapes using a Phantom forcefeedback device. Each active subject?s movements were used to guide a passive subject over the same stimuli. In Experiment 1 the active subject?s movements were recorded and "played back" to the passive counterpart at a later time — a delayed yoking. Two Phantoms were used in Experiment 2 so that as the active subject explored, the passive subject was guided simultaneously along the same movement pathway. Active exploration yielded significantly shorter latencies than did passive-guided exploration.
Citation:
Mark A. Symmons, Barry L. Richardson, Dianne B. Wuillemin, George H. VanDoorn, "Active versus Passive Touch in Three Dimensions," whc, pp.108-113, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'05), 2005
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.