loading...
Comparison Between the Morphological Skeleton and Morphological Shape Decomposition
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/34.537351September 1996 (vol. 18 no. 9) pp. 951-957
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   

Abstract—The morphological skeleton and morphological shape decomposition (MSD) are two popular approaches for morphological shape representation. Each method represents an object as an algebraic combination of a number of components, where each component is given by a locus of points dilated by a specified structuring-element homothetic. This correspondence develops a theoretical comparison between the two methods. Combining the theoretical results with several representation cost measures, we make a concrete comparison of the efficiency of the two methods. The results indicate that for complex objects—i.e., objects requiring a full range of homothetic sizes in the morphological skeleton representation—the MSD represents objects more efficiently than the morphological skeleton for three of four suggested cost measures.

[1] 951 P.A. Maragos and R.W. Schafer, "Morphological Skeleton Representation and Coding of Binary Images," IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 34, pp. 1,228-1,244, Oct. 1986.
[2] P. Maragos, "Pattern Spectrum and Multiscale Shape Representation," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11, pp. 701-716, 1989.
[3] J. Goutsias and D. Schonfeld, "Morphological Representation of Discrete and Binary Images," IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 39, pp. 1,369-1,379, 1991.
[4] K. Shoji, "Generalized Skeleton Representation and Adaptive Rectangular Decomposition of Binary Images," Proc. SPIE Conf. Image Algebra Math. Morphological Image Processing, vol. 1,769, pp. 404-415,San Diego, Calif., July 1992.
[5] T.-W. Pai and J.H.L. Hansen, "Boundary-Constrained Morphological Skeleton Minimization and Skeleton Reconstruction," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, pp. 201-208, Feb. 1994.
[6] R. Kresch and D. Malah, "Morphological Reduction of Skeleton Redundancy," Signal Processing, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 143-151, July 1994.
[7] I. Pitas and A.N. Venetsanopoulos, “Morphological Shape Decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 1, pp 38-45, Jan. 1990.
[8] I. Pitas and A.N. Venetsanopoulos, "Morphological Shape Representation," Pattern Recognition, vol. 25, pp. 555-565, June 1992.
[9] T. Kimoto, M. Asai, and Y. Yasuda, "Shape Description by a Distribution Function Based on Morphological Decomposition," Proc. SPIE Conf. Visual Comm. and Image Processing, vol. 1,818, pp. 897-906,Boston, Nov.18-20, 1992.
[10] J.M. Reinhardt and W.E. Higgins, "Flexible Search-Based Approach for Morphological Shape Decomposition," Proc. SPIE Conf. Visual Comm., vol. 2,094, Boston, pp. 1,424-1,435, Nov.8-11, 1993.
[11] J.M. Reinhardt and W.E. Higgins, "Shape Representation: Comparison Between the Morphological Skeleton and Morphological Shape Decomposition," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Processing, vol. 1, pp. 91-95,Austin, Texas, Nov.13-16, 1994.
[12] J.M. Reinhardt and W.E. Higgins, "Efficient Morphological Shape Representation," IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89- 101, Jan. 1996.
[13] J.M. Reinhardt and W.E. Higgins, "Progress Toward Comparing the Morphological Skeleton and Morphological Shape Decomposition," Technical Report ENGTR 96-31, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa., 1995.
[14] C.H. Richardson and R.W. Schafer, "Symbolic Manipulation and Analysis of Morphological Expressions," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 2,173-2,176,Albuquerque, N.M., Apr. 1990.
[15] R. van den Boomgaard and R. van Balen, “Methods for Fast Morphological Image Transforms Using Bitmapped Binary Images,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing: Graphical Models and Image Processing, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 252-258, May 1992.
[16] B. Kisacanin and D. Schonfeld, "A Fast Thresholded Linear Convolution Representation of Morphological Operations," IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 455-457, July 1994.

Index Terms:
Mathematical morphology, shape representation, morphological skeleton, morphological shape decomposition, image analysis, computer vision, shape analysis.
Citation:
Joseph M. Reinhardt, William E. Higgins, "Comparison Between the Morphological Skeleton and Morphological Shape Decomposition," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 951-957, Sept. 1996, doi:10.1109/34.537351
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.