loading...
Quality & People in the Development of Situationally Specific Methods
Hong Kong December 10-December 11
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/APAQS.2001.990020Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Qua ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
S. Young, University of Sunderland
S. McDonald, University of Sunderland
H. Edwards, University of Sunderland
J. Thompson, University of Sunderland
It is argued that personality testing and group dynamic principles could improve the success of development teams in developing systems by providing a mechanism for repeatable and valid identification, rating and selection of stakeholders in the method engineering process. The method presented, MEWSIC, aims to formalise the development of situational methods so that the link to quality assurance processes are retained. MEWSIC accounts for the number of stakeholders who have a legitimate interest in the success of the project, but distinguishes between those who provide input that informs the method engineering process, those who carry out this process and their team role types. An overview of MEWSIC and a discussion in the need for personality testing and group dynamic measures is given.
Index Terms:
Collaborative Development, Systems Development, Method Engineering, Stakeholders Group Dynamics Personality Testing
Citation:
S. Young, S. McDonald, H. Edwards, J. Thompson, "Quality & People in the Development of Situationally Specific Methods," apaqs, pp.0199, Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software (APAQS'01), 2001
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.