loading...
Comparison of Simulation and Performance Modeling - A Case Study
March 31-April 04
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ECBS.2008.4715th Annual IEEE International Confer ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
The prediction of the performance at early stages of the development of large software systems has turned out to be a very challenging task. There are already several techniques and methodologies available, each having its own advantages and limitations. This paper discusses using different techniques, one analytical and one simulative, for performance analysis in one case study and compares the results and thereby validates the accuracy of each technique. This paper is a proof of concept for a new modeling technique called FMC-QE (Fundamental Modeling Concepts for Quantitative Evaluation) and the simulation framework Perfact. Perfact simulates the performance of early prototypes in the real application environment. The examined case study is a Web service application run in the SAP environment. It was modeled with use of FMC-QE and simulated with the Perfact framework.
Citation:
Marcel Seelig, Stephan Kluth, Tomasz Porzucek, Flavius Copaciu, Nico Naumann, Steffen K?, "Comparison of Simulation and Performance Modeling - A Case Study," ecbs, pp.49-56, 15th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ecbs 2008), 2008
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.


Suggestions