loading...
Electronics Design-for-Test: Past, Present and Future
Freiburg, Germany May 20-May 24
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ETS.2007.2112th IEEE European Test Symposium (ET ...
 This Article 
 
PURCHASE ARTICLE: $0
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Ben Bennetts, ex-DFT Consultant, UK
Do you know how many ENIAC vacuum tubes were replaced every day during its heyday? What did it teach us about Test, or Design-For-Test? Did Eldred really invent the stuck-at fault model in 1959? Is 99.999% fault cover all it?s cracked up to be or are we fooling ourselves? Are we better off with 115% or even 80%? Where did Design-For-Test come from? Where is it now? Where?s it heading? Is it true that boundary scan is the panacea of test? What are all these new Joint Test Action Groups -- Internal, System and compact? Are they boondoggles, or are they serious?
Citation:
Ben Bennetts, "Electronics Design-for-Test: Past, Present and Future," ets, pp.4, 12th IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS'07), 2007
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.