loading...
Inapproximability Results for Sparsest Cut, Optimal Linear Arrangement, and Precedence Constrained Scheduling
Providence, Rhode Island October 21-October 23
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/FOCS.2007.4048th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundat ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
We consider (Uniform) Sparsest Cut, Optimal Linear Arrangement and the precedence constrained scheduling problem 1\left| {prec} \right|\sum {w_j C_j }. So far, these three notorious NPhard problems have resisted all attempts to prove inapproximability results. We show that they have no Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS), unless NP-complete problems can be solved in randomized subexponential time. Furthermore, we prove that the scheduling problem is as hard to approximate as Vertex Cover when the so-called fixed cost, that is present in all feasible solutions, is subtracted from the objective function.
Citation:
Christoph Ambühl, Monaldo Mastrolilli, Ola Svensson, "Inapproximability Results for Sparsest Cut, Optimal Linear Arrangement, and Precedence Constrained Scheduling," focs, pp.329-337, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07), 2007
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.