loading...
Some Implications of Comparing Brain and Computer Processing
Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii January 07-January 10
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.408Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii ...
 This Article 
 
PURCHASE ARTICLE: $0
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Like a computer, the human brain inputs, processes, stores and outputs information. Yet the brain evolved along different design principles from those of the Von Neumann architecture that lies behind most computers in operation today. A comparison of human and computer information processing styles suggests basic differences in: 1. Control (Central vs. Distributed), 2. Input (Sequential vs. Parallel), 3. Output (Exclusive vs. Overlaid), 4. Storage (by Address vs. by Content), 5. Initiation (Input vs. Process driven) and 6. Self Processing (Low vs. High). The conclusion is that the brain is a different type of information processor, not an inferior one. This suggests replacing technological utopianism with socio-technical progress, where computers plus people form more powerful systems than either alone. For this to occur, the computer must change its role from clever actor to simple assistant.
Citation:
Brian Whitworth, "Some Implications of Comparing Brain and Computer Processing," hicss, pp.38, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), 2008
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.