loading...
Misleading Metrics and Unsound Analyses
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2007.49March/April 2007 (vol. 24 no. 2) pp. 73-78
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Barbara Kitchenham, National ICT Australia
David Ross Jeffery, National ICT Australia
Colin Connaughton, IBM Australia
The authors demonstrate that the recommendations for analyzing productivity in the appendix to the ISO/IEC 15939 standard are inappropriate. They also show that problems with the ISO/IEC advice can be compounded if software engineers attempt to apply statistical process-control techniques to software productivity metrics. They recommend using small meaningful data sets as the basis for productivity analysis and using effort-estimation models to assess productivity rather than productivity metrics.This article is part of a special focus section on software metrics.
Index Terms:
productivity metrics, effort estimation, statistical process control, ISO/IEC 15939
Citation:
Barbara Kitchenham, David Ross Jeffery, Colin Connaughton, "Misleading Metrics and Unsound Analyses," IEEE Software, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 73-78, Mar./Apr. 2007, doi:10.1109/MS.2007.49
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.