loading...
Handling Nominal Features in Anomaly Intrusion Detection Problems
Tokyo, Japan April 03-April 04
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/RIDE.2005.1015th International Workshop on Resear ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Mei-Ling Shyu, University of Miami
Kanoksri Sarinnapakorn, University of Miami
Indika Kuruppu-Appuhamilage, University of Miami
Shu-Ching Chen, Florida International University
LiWu Chang, Naval Research Laboratory
Thomas Goldring, National Security Agency
Computer network data stream used in intrusion detection usually involve many data types. A common data type is that of symbolic or nominal features. Whether being coded into numerical values or not, nominal features need to be treated differently from numeric features. This paper studies the effectiveness of two approaches in handling nominal features: a simple coding scheme via the use of indicator variables and a scaling method based on multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). In particular, we apply the techniques with two anomaly detection methods: the principal component classifier (PCC) and the Canberra metric. The experiments with KDD 1999 data demonstrate that MCA works better than the indicator variable approach for both detection methods with the PCC coming much ahead of the Canberra metric.
Index Terms:
Anomaly detection, intrusion detection, indicator variables, multiple correspondence analysis, nominal features, principal component classifier
Citation:
Mei-Ling Shyu, Kanoksri Sarinnapakorn, Indika Kuruppu-Appuhamilage, Shu-Ching Chen, LiWu Chang, Thomas Goldring, "Handling Nominal Features in Anomaly Intrusion Detection Problems," ride, pp.55-62, 15th International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering: Stream Data Mining and Applications (RIDE-SDMA'05), 2005
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.


Suggestions