loading...
A Comparison of Wireless Sensor Network Routing Protocols on an Experimental Testbed
Taichung, Taiwan June 05-June 07
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/SUTC.2006.1IEEE International Conference on Sens ...
 This Article 
 
PDF
HTML
 
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Nam N. Pham, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Jon Youn, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Chulho Won, University of Nebraska at Omaha
In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption.
Citation:
Nam N. Pham, Jon Youn, Chulho Won, "A Comparison of Wireless Sensor Network Routing Protocols on an Experimental Testbed," sutc, vol. 2, pp.276-281, IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing - Vol 2 - Workshops, 2006
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.