The Perceptual Scalability of Visualization
|
Larger, higher resolution displays can be used to increase the scalability of information visualizations. But just how much can scalability increase using larger displays before hitting human perceptual or cognitive limits? Are the same visualization techniques that are good on a single monitor also the techniques that are best when they are scaled up using large, high-resolution displays? To answer these questions we performed a controlled experiment on user performance time, accuracy, and subjective workload when scaling up data quantity with different space-time-attribute visualizations using a large, tiled display. Twelve college students used small multiples, embedded bar matrices, and embedded time-series graphs either on a 2 megapixel (Mp) display or with data scaled up using a 32 Mp tiled display. Participants performed various overview and detail tasks on geospatially-referenced multidimensional time-series data. Results showed that current designs are perceptually scalable because they result in a decrease in task completion time when normalized per number of data attributes along with no decrease in accuracy. It appears that, for the visualizations selected for this study, the relative comparison between designs is generally consistent between display sizes. However, results also suggest that encoding is more important on a smaller display while spatial grouping is more important on a larger display. Some suggestions for designers are provided based on our experience designing visualizations for large displays.
[1] 837 S. G. Eick and A. F. Karr, "Visual Scalability," Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 22–43, 2002.
[2] T. A. Sandstrom, C. Henze, and C. Levit, "The Hyperwall," Proc. Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV), pp. 124–133, 2003.
[3] B. Wei, C. Silva, E. Koutsofios, S. Krishnan, and S. North, "Visualization Research with Large Displays," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 50–54, 2000.
[4] "Stones & Mortar," National Park Service, http://www.nps.gov/mall/mortarmortar.htm#vive , 2004.
[5] C. Ware, Information Visualization: Perception for Design: Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
[6] K. Li, H. Chen, Y. Chen, D. W. Clark, P. Cook, S. Damianakis, G. Essl, A. Finkelstein, T. Funkhouser, T. Housel, A. Klein, Z. Liu, E. Praun, R. Samanta, B. Shedd, J. P. Singh, G. Tzanetakis, and J. Zheng, "Building and Using a Scalable Display Wall System," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 29–37, 2000.
[7] G. K. Starkweather, "DSHARP-A Wide-Screen Multi-Projector Display," Journal of Optics: Pure and Applied Optics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. S136–S139, 2003.
[8] M. Hereld, I. R. Judson, and R. L. Stevens, "Tutorial: Introduction to Building Projection-based Tiled Display Systems," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 22–28, 2000.
[9] G. Humphreys, M. Houston, R. Ng, R. Frank, S. Ahern, P. D. Kirchner, and J. T. Klosowski, "Chromium: A Stream-Processing Framework for Interactive Rendering on Clusters," ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 693–702, 2002.
[10] O. G. Staadt, J. Walker, C. Nuber, and B. Hamann, "A Survey and Performance Analysis of Software Platforms for Interactive Cluster-Based Multi-Screen Rendering," in Workshop on Virtual Environments. Zurich, Switzerland: ACM, 2003.
[11] T. Ni, G. S. Schmidt, O. G. Staadt, M. A. Livingston, R. Ball, and R. May, "A Survey of Large High-Resolution Display Technologies, Techniques, and Applications," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 223–234, 2006.
[12] S. Elrod, R. Bruce, R. Gold, D. Goldberg, F. Halasz, W. Janssen, D. Lee, K. McCall, E. Pedersen, K. Pier, J. Tank, and B. Welch, "Liveboard: A Large Interactive Display Supporting Group Meetings, Presentations, and Remote Collaboration," Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 599–607, 1992.
[13] B. Johanson, A. Fox, and T. Winograd, "The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2002.
[14] N. A. Streitz, J. Geibler, T. Holmer, S.-i. Konomi, C. Muller-Tomfelde, W. Reischl, P. Rexroth, P. Seitz, and R. Steinmetz, "i-LAND: An Interactive Landscape for Creativity and Innovation," Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 120–127, 1999.
[15] D. Tan, D. Gergle, P. Scupelli, and R. Pausch, "With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Spatial Performance," Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 217–224, 2003.
[16] M. Czerwinski, D. Tan, and G. Robertson, "Women Take a Wider View," Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 195–202, 2002.
[17] T. Ni, D. Bowman, and J. Chen, "Increased Display Size and Resolution Improve Task Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Environments," Proc. Graphics Interface, pp. 139–146, 2006.
[18] R. Ball and C. North, "Effects of Tiled High-Resolution Displays on Basic Visualization and Navigation Tasks," Proc. Extended abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1196–1199, 2005.
[19] R. Ball, M. Varghese, A. Sabri, E. D. Cox, C. Fierer, M. Peterson, B. Carstensen, and C. North, "Evaluating the Benefits of Tiled Displays for Navigating Maps," Proc. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IASTED-HCI), pp. 66–71, 2005.
[20] L. Shupp, R. Ball, B. Yost, J. Booker, and C. North, "Evaluation of Viewport Size and Curvature of Large, High-Resolution Displays," Proc. Graphics Interface (GI), pp. 123–130, 2006.
[21] J. D. Fekete and C. Plaisant, "Interactive Information Visualization of a Million Items," Proc. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 117–124, 2002.
[22] E. Wegman, "Huge Datasets and the Frontiers of Computational Feasibility," Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 281–295, 1995.
[23] E. R. Tufte, Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 1983.
[24] E. H. Chi, J. Riedl, P. Barry, and J. Konstan, "Principles for Information Visualization Spreadsheets," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (Special Issue on Visualization), vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 30–38, 1998.
[25] C. D. Wickens and C. M. Carswell, "The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display Design," Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 473–494, 1995.
[26] B. Yost and C. North, "Single Complex Glyphs Versus Multiple Simple Glyphs," Proc. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1889–1892, 2005.
[27] A. M. MacEachren, How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design. New York: The Guilford Press, 1995.
[28] A. Bezerianos and R. Balakrishnan, "View and Space Management on Large Displays," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 34–43, 2005.
[29] G. Robertson, M. Czerwinski, P. Baudisch, B. Meyers, D. Robbins, G. Smith, and D. Tan, "The Large-Display User Experience," IEEE Computer Graphcs and Applications, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 44–51, 2005.
[30] W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill, "Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 79, no. 387, pp. 531–554, 1984.
[31] J. D. Mackinlay, "Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations," ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–141, 1986.
Index Terms:
Information visualization, large displays, empirical evaluation
Citation:
Beth Yost, Chris North, "The Perceptual Scalability of Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 837-844, Sept. 2006, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2006.184
PURCHASE ARTICLE: $19
IEEE Xplore Subscribers
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb